The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of Karl Barth. Matthias Gockel shows that the doctrine of election in B… Mehr…
The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of Karl Barth. Matthias Gockel shows that the doctrine of election in Barth's early theology bears a remarkable resemblance to the position of Schleiermacher. He challenges the conventional wisdom that these two positions - or 'liberal theology' and 'dialectical theology' - stand in irreconcilable opposition. Barth articulates a fresh assessment of the doctrine not only in Church Dogmatics II/2, but in the second edition of his Epistle to the Romans and in his first series of lectures on Systematic Theology, the so-called Göttingen Dogmatics. Hence, a resemblance between Schleiermacher and Barth is already discernible in Barth's early theology - at a time when he was writing his most virulent criticisms of Schleiermacher. Digital Content>E-books>Religion,Inspiration>Christianity>Christianity, OUP Oxford Digital >16<
BarnesandNoble.com
new in stock. Versandkosten:zzgl. Versandkosten. Details...
(*) Derzeit vergriffen bedeutet, dass dieser Titel momentan auf keiner der angeschlossenen Plattform verfügbar ist.
The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of Karl Barth.Matthias Gockel shows that the doctrine of election in Ba… Mehr…
The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of Karl Barth.Matthias Gockel shows that the doctrine of election in Barth's early theology bears a remarkable resemblance to the position of Schleiermacher.He challenges the conventional wisdom that these two positions - or `liberal theology' and `dialectical theology' - stand in irreconcilable opposition.Barth articulates a fresh assessment of thedoctrine not only in Church Dogmatics II/2, but in the second edition of his Epistle to the Romans and in his first series of lectures on Systematic Theology, the so-called Göttingen Dogmatics.Hence, a resemblance between Schleiermacher and Barth is already discernible in Barth's early theology - ata time when he was writing his most virulent criticisms of Schleiermacher.; PDF; Politics, Philosphy & Religion > Religion & beliefs > Christianity > Christian theology, OUP Oxford<
hive.co.uk
No. 9780191525278. Versandkosten:Instock, Despatched same working day before 3pm, zzgl. Versandkosten. Details...
(*) Derzeit vergriffen bedeutet, dass dieser Titel momentan auf keiner der angeschlossenen Plattform verfügbar ist.
A Systematic-Theological Comparison, eBooks, eBook Download (PDF), The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of K… Mehr…
A Systematic-Theological Comparison, eBooks, eBook Download (PDF), The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of Karl Barth. Matthias Gockel shows that the doctrine of election in Barth's early theology bears a remarkable resemblance to the position of Schleiermacher. He challenges the conventional wisdom that these two positions - or `liberal theology' and `dialectical theology' - stand in irreconcilable opposition. Barth articulates a fresh assessment of thedoctrine not only in Church Dogmatics II/2, but in the second edition of his Epistle to the Romans and in his first series of lectures on Systematic Theology, the so-called Gttingen Dogmatics. Hence, a resemblance between Schleiermacher and Barth is already discernible in Barth's early theology - ata time when he was writing his most virulent criticisms of Schleiermacher. [PU: OUP Oxford], Seiten: 240, OUP Oxford, 2007<
Michael Reynolds: Barth and Schleiermacher on the Doctrine of Election: A Systematic-Theological Comparison : A Systematic-Theological Comparison - neues Buch
A new interpretation of the two most important Protestant theologians in the 19th and 20th century, Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834) and Karl Barth (1886-1968).Matthias Gockel focuses… Mehr…
A new interpretation of the two most important Protestant theologians in the 19th and 20th century, Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834) and Karl Barth (1886-1968).Matthias Gockel focuses on the doctrine of election or predestination, and shows that Schleiermacher's original approach to this was taken one step further by Barth.; PDF; Politics, Philosphy & Religion > Religion & beliefs > Christianity > Christian theology, OUP Oxford<
hive.co.uk
No. 9780191525278. Versandkosten:Instock, Despatched same working day before 3pm, zzgl. Versandkosten. Details...
(*) Derzeit vergriffen bedeutet, dass dieser Titel momentan auf keiner der angeschlossenen Plattform verfügbar ist.
The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of Karl Barth. Matthias Gockel shows that the doctrine of election in B… Mehr…
The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of Karl Barth. Matthias Gockel shows that the doctrine of election in Barth's early theology bears a remarkable resemblance to the position of Schleiermacher. He challenges the conventional wisdom that these two positions - or 'liberal theology' and 'dialectical theology' - stand in irreconcilable opposition. Barth articulates a fresh assessment of the doctrine not only in Church Dogmatics II/2, but in the second edition of his Epistle to the Romans and in his first series of lectures on Systematic Theology, the so-called Göttingen Dogmatics. Hence, a resemblance between Schleiermacher and Barth is already discernible in Barth's early theology - at a time when he was writing his most virulent criticisms of Schleiermacher. Digital Content>E-books>Religion,Inspiration>Christianity>Christianity, OUP Oxford Digital >16<
The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of Karl Barth.Matthias Gockel shows that the doctrine of election in Ba… Mehr…
The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of Karl Barth.Matthias Gockel shows that the doctrine of election in Barth's early theology bears a remarkable resemblance to the position of Schleiermacher.He challenges the conventional wisdom that these two positions - or `liberal theology' and `dialectical theology' - stand in irreconcilable opposition.Barth articulates a fresh assessment of thedoctrine not only in Church Dogmatics II/2, but in the second edition of his Epistle to the Romans and in his first series of lectures on Systematic Theology, the so-called Göttingen Dogmatics.Hence, a resemblance between Schleiermacher and Barth is already discernible in Barth's early theology - ata time when he was writing his most virulent criticisms of Schleiermacher.; PDF; Politics, Philosphy & Religion > Religion & beliefs > Christianity > Christian theology, OUP Oxford<
No. 9780191525278. Versandkosten:Instock, Despatched same working day before 3pm, zzgl. Versandkosten.
A Systematic-Theological Comparison, eBooks, eBook Download (PDF), The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of K… Mehr…
A Systematic-Theological Comparison, eBooks, eBook Download (PDF), The first detailed comparison between the theologies of Friedrich Schleiermacher and the early dialectical theology of Karl Barth. Matthias Gockel shows that the doctrine of election in Barth's early theology bears a remarkable resemblance to the position of Schleiermacher. He challenges the conventional wisdom that these two positions - or `liberal theology' and `dialectical theology' - stand in irreconcilable opposition. Barth articulates a fresh assessment of thedoctrine not only in Church Dogmatics II/2, but in the second edition of his Epistle to the Romans and in his first series of lectures on Systematic Theology, the so-called Gttingen Dogmatics. Hence, a resemblance between Schleiermacher and Barth is already discernible in Barth's early theology - ata time when he was writing his most virulent criticisms of Schleiermacher. [PU: OUP Oxford], Seiten: 240, OUP Oxford, 2007<
Michael Reynolds: Barth and Schleiermacher on the Doctrine of Election: A Systematic-Theological Comparison : A Systematic-Theological Comparison - neues Buch
A new interpretation of the two most important Protestant theologians in the 19th and 20th century, Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834) and Karl Barth (1886-1968).Matthias Gockel focuses… Mehr…
A new interpretation of the two most important Protestant theologians in the 19th and 20th century, Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834) and Karl Barth (1886-1968).Matthias Gockel focuses on the doctrine of election or predestination, and shows that Schleiermacher's original approach to this was taken one step further by Barth.; PDF; Politics, Philosphy & Religion > Religion & beliefs > Christianity > Christian theology, OUP Oxford<
No. 9780191525278. Versandkosten:Instock, Despatched same working day before 3pm, zzgl. Versandkosten.
1Da einige Plattformen keine Versandkonditionen übermitteln und diese vom Lieferland, dem Einkaufspreis, dem Gewicht und der Größe des Artikels, einer möglichen Mitgliedschaft der Plattform, einer direkten Lieferung durch die Plattform oder über einen Drittanbieter (Marketplace), etc. abhängig sein können, ist es möglich, dass die von eurobuch angegebenen Versandkosten nicht mit denen der anbietenden Plattform übereinstimmen.
Buch in der Datenbank seit 2008-12-11T04:33:07+01:00 (Berlin) Detailseite zuletzt geändert am 2024-03-16T21:26:21+01:00 (Berlin) ISBN/EAN: 9780191525278
ISBN - alternative Schreibweisen: 978-0-19-152527-8 Alternative Schreibweisen und verwandte Suchbegriffe: Autor des Buches: gockel, willing matthias, göcke, schleiermacher, michael reynolds, karl barth Titel des Buches: schleiermacher, barth, theological, doctrine
Weitere, andere Bücher, die diesem Buch sehr ähnlich sein könnten:
