2009, ISBN: 9781234532901

Rarebooksclub.com. Paperback. New. This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 222 pages. Original publisher: Rockville, Md. : Agency Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009 OCLC Number: (… Mehr…

Rarebooksclub.com. Paperback. New. This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 222 pages. Original publisher: Rockville, Md. : Agency Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009 OCLC Number: (OCoLC)301351819 Subject: Backache -- Alternative treatment. Excerpt: . . . patterns of relative use for acute versus chronic recurrent back pain and the degree to which different CAM therapies are sought would assist in understanding patterns of use within these populations. In general, our findings on utilization of CAM in persons with back pain, highlight the need for high quality prospective observational studies to establish utilization data by location of complaint, the specific type of CAM therapy linked to specific providers, the degree to which the care is used as complementary or alternative to conventional care, and the degree to which different CAM therapies are combined for an episode of care. The widely varying rates of use are related to number of factors including: the type of sample recruited ( i. e. , large national sample or smaller practice based sample ), the timeframe for recall ( i. e. , four weeks versus lifetime use ), the anatomical region, and the method used to measure utilization. The majority of studies reported on contact utilization ( ever using the service or provider ) rather than volume utilization ( the frequency and duration of visits ). The majority of studies also reported on use for the low back and did not evaluate the effects of the duration of the back pain ( acute versus chronic ) in regards to the reported use of CAM. Our evaluation of U. S. CPG showed very limited information on the recommended use of CAM therapies with only a single guideline providing utilization recommendations. A significant gap with regards to recommended utilization for persons with back pain of differing duration and anatomical region has been identified. In part, this lack of recommendations on CAM utilization for back pain may reflect the lack of high quality evidence from randomized trials focusing on the optimal dosage for treatment benefit. The m. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN., Rarebooksclub.com<

2009, ISBN: 9781234532901

RareBooksClub. Paperback. New. This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 222 pages. Original publisher: Rockville, Md. : Agency Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009 OCLC Number: (OCoL… Mehr…

RareBooksClub. Paperback. New. This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 222 pages. Original publisher: Rockville, Md. : Agency Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009 OCLC Number: (OCoLC)301351819 Subject: Backache -- Alternative treatment. Excerpt: . . . patterns of relative use for acute versus chronic recurrent back pain and the degree to which different CAM therapies are sought would assist in understanding patterns of use within these populations. In general, our findings on utilization of CAM in persons with back pain, highlight the need for high quality prospective observational studies to establish utilization data by location of complaint, the specific type of CAM therapy linked to specific providers, the degree to which the care is used as complementary or alternative to conventional care, and the degree to which different CAM therapies are combined for an episode of care. The widely varying rates of use are related to number of factors including: the type of sample recruited ( i. e. , large national sample or smaller practice based sample ), the timeframe for recall ( i. e. , four weeks versus lifetime use ), the anatomical region, and the method used to measure utilization. The majority of studies reported on contact utilization ( ever using the service or provider ) rather than volume utilization ( the frequency and duration of visits ). The majority of studies also reported on use for the low back and did not evaluate the effects of the duration of the back pain ( acute versus chronic ) in regards to the reported use of CAM. Our evaluation of U. S. CPG showed very limited information on the recommended use of CAM therapies with only a single guideline providing utilization recommendations. A significant gap with regards to recommended utilization for persons with back pain of differing duration and anatomical region has been identified. In part, this lack of recommendations on CAM utilization for back pain may reflect the lack of high quality evidence from randomized trials focusing on the optimal dosage for treatment benefit. The m. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN., RareBooksClub<

2009, ISBN: 9781234532901

RareBooksClub. Paperback. New. This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 222 pages. Original publisher: Rockville, Md. : Agency Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009 OCLC Number: (OCoL… Mehr…

RareBooksClub. Paperback. New. This item is printed on demand. Paperback. 222 pages. Original publisher: Rockville, Md. : Agency Healthcare Research and Quality, 2009 OCLC Number: (OCoLC)301351819 Subject: Backache -- Alternative treatment. Excerpt: . . . patterns of relative use for acute versus chronic recurrent back pain and the degree to which different CAM therapies are sought would assist in understanding patterns of use within these populations. In general, our findings on utilization of CAM in persons with back pain, highlight the need for high quality prospective observational studies to establish utilization data by location of complaint, the specific type of CAM therapy linked to specific providers, the degree to which the care is used as complementary or alternative to conventional care, and the degree to which different CAM therapies are combined for an episode of care. The widely varying rates of use are related to number of factors including: the type of sample recruited ( i. e. , large national sample or smaller practice based sample ), the timeframe for recall ( i. e. , four weeks versus lifetime use ), the anatomical region, and the method used to measure utilization. The majority of studies reported on contact utilization ( ever using the service or provider ) rather than volume utilization ( the frequency and duration of visits ). The majority of studies also reported on use for the low back and did not evaluate the effects of the duration of the back pain ( acute versus chronic ) in regards to the reported use of CAM. Our evaluation of U. S. CPG showed very limited information on the recommended use of CAM therapies with only a single guideline providing utilization recommendations. A significant gap with regards to recommended utilization for persons with back pain of differing duration and anatomical region has been identified. In part, this lack of recommendations on CAM utilization for back pain may reflect the lack of high quality evidence from randomized trials focusing on the optimal dosage for treatment benefit. The m. . . This item ships from La Vergne,TN., RareBooksClub<

2014, ISBN: 9781234532901

Trade paperback, New., Text in German, English. Trade paperback (US). Glued binding. 140 p. Contains: Illustrations, black & white., Miami FL, [PU: Rarebooksclub.com]